Writing Task 2 · Advantages and disadvantages

Demolishing old buildings for urban development: a critical analysis: IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer

An IELTS Writing Task 2 advantages and disadvantages essay question with a Band 8 sample answer, the plan behind it, the vocabulary that lifts it and what an examiner looks for.
  • 293 words
  • Advantages and disadvantages
  • General Training
  • 40 minutes

The question

In many cities, there is a lack of space to develop and as a result, in order to modernize, old buildings are demolished and replaced with new buildings. What are the disadvantages of knocking down old buildings? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

About 40 minutes. Write at least 250 words.

Advantages and disadvantages

Plan before you write

  1. 1

    Your position

    While urban expansion is necessary, the irreversible loss of cultural heritage and environmental stability outweighs the benefits of modern construction.

  2. 2

    Paragraph 2

    The primary drawback of demolishing historic structures is the erosion of a city’s cultural identity and architectural diversity.

  3. 3

    Paragraph 3

    Although new buildings offer improved efficiency and density, these gains do not compensate for the loss of historical character and environmental cost.

  • →If the question says outweigh, decide which side wins and say so in the introduction.
  • →One paragraph for advantages, one for disadvantages, each with a concrete example.
  • →The conclusion must give the verdict; listing both sides without one loses task response.

Model answer

Band 8 sample essay

Band 8293 words · use the structure and vocabulary, not the sentences

Urbanisation pressures often force planners to prioritise space, leading to the systematic demolition of ageing structures to accommodate modern infrastructure. While this trend facilitates rapid development, it invites significant criticism regarding the preservation of urban heritage and environmental sustainability. This essay will argue that the negative consequences of destroying historic sites outweigh the superficial advantages of modernisation.

The most significant disadvantage of replacing historic buildings is the irrevocable loss of cultural identity. Architecture serves as a tangible record of a city’s history, providing residents with a sense of continuity and belonging. When these landmarks are replaced by generic glass and steel towers, a city risks losing its unique character, becoming indistinguishable from others. For instance, the destruction of historic Victorian districts in London to make way for high-density apartments has stripped certain neighbourhoods of their aesthetic charm, leaving behind a sterile urban landscape that lacks historical narrative.

Proponents of demolition argue that modern buildings are more space-efficient and energy-efficient, yet these short-term gains are often overstated. New construction projects consume vast amounts of natural resources and generate significant carbon emissions, whereas retrofitting existing structures is frequently more sustainable. Furthermore, while modern buildings may increase residential capacity, they often fail to foster the same sense of community that historic, human-scale architecture provides. For example, many modern developments suffer from poor social integration, whereas historic city centres often retain vibrant, pedestrian-friendly environments that promote social interaction.

In summary, the drive to modernise urban spaces through the demolition of historic buildings is a short-sighted strategy. The cultural erosion and environmental impact caused by this practice represent a heavy price to pay for increased density. Consequently, urban planners should prioritise the preservation and adaptive reuse of old buildings to maintain a sustainable and culturally rich city environment.

Examiner's view

Why this scores Band 8

This essay achieves Band 8 by consistently addressing both parts of the prompt with a clear, logical progression and sophisticated vocabulary. A Band 6 response typically fails to provide a balanced argument, often focusing only on the benefits of new buildings while neglecting the specific disadvantages of demolition.

Now write it yourself, against the clock

Forty minutes, then a band for task response, coherence, vocabulary and grammar from BandLadder AI, with the sentences that cost you marks highlighted.

Write it and get a band free →

8 words

Vocabulary from the essay

  • irrevocable

    impossible to change or bring back once done

  • tangible record

    physical evidence that can be seen or touched

  • sterile

    lacking in character, interest, or creative energy

  • retrofitting

    adding new components to older existing systems

  • human-scale

    designed to be comfortable for people to use

  • short-sighted

    failing to consider long-term consequences of actions

  • adaptive reuse

    repurposing old buildings for new, modern functions

  • indistinguishable

    impossible to tell apart from other similar things

More words for this topic: IELTS vocabulary for culture and tradition.

Frequently asked questions

What type of essay is "Demolishing old buildings for urban development: a critical analysis"?+

Advantages and disadvantages. If the question says outweigh, decide which side wins and say so in the introduction.

How many words should an IELTS Writing Task 2 essay be?+

At least 250 words, in about 40 minutes. This sample is 293 words, written to fit that time with five minutes left to check grammar.

How is IELTS Writing Task 2 scored?+

On four criteria: task response, coherence and cohesion, vocabulary, and grammatical range and accuracy. Task 2 counts for twice as much as Task 1 in your Writing band.

What is the difference between a Band 6 and a Band 8 answer here?+

This essay achieves Band 8 by consistently addressing both parts of the prompt with a clear, logical progression and sophisticated vocabulary. A Band 6 response typically fails to provide a balanced argument, often focusing only on the benefits of new buildings while neglecting the specific disadvantages of demolition.

Keep practising

More sample essays

© 2026 BandLadder. Written and checked by the BandLadder team. You may quote or cite this page with credit to BandLadder and a link to it; republishing it in full needs our written permission. Content use policy

Write it and get a band free